Psycholgy exhibited in the film John Q Essay

When asked to fall out something in the media that directly relates to subject matter that had been discussed in our psychology class on that point were a couple of topics that came to mind. However, one stands out to me in particular, and that is a word-painting that I have seen of late harbingered hindquarters Q. In this film Denzel cap plays the role of John Q. Archibald, a objet dart who will go to some(prenominal) lengths to keep his one and only news, Michael, from dying. During the characterization, John and his wife, Denise, learn that Michael has an enlarged titty and needs an arrest transplant operation. On top of that, John has recently been reduced from full-time to part-time work. He cant consecrate the operation and his health indemnity wont cover it, so he vows to do whatever it will take to keep his son alive. This obviously becomes an extremely difficult moral decision that Archibald must make.In the psychology text editionbook, there is real similar example to what occurred in the movie John Q, this example was used by a psychologist by the fig of Kohlberg to conduct a moral reasoning experiment. The land site in the text tells of a muliebrity that is near death with a special instance of cancer, and there is only one, recently developed drug that could possibly keep back her. However, the druggist was apparently charging 10 times what it cost to make the drug, which is 2000 dollars. The womans husband tried to get all the money he could however came up short, and the druggist refused to cut him a deal, and therefore, leaving the man two choices, to either let his wife die, or steal the medicine. And interchangeable any good husband the man broke into the store and take the drug for his wife.This above situation when described in class do me immediately think of the movie John Q, and is the reason this paper is be written. In the film however, the victim was a child who has barely experienced support yet, and measure s for his survival were much more desperate. Instead of a simply a simple pill or treatment this boy required a new heart, and a matching heart with that, and without the proper insurance the transplant was near impossible. So, John took the matter into his own hands. He snarl that his only option is to take the emergency way hostage until the doctors hold back to give his son the operation that he desperately needs and find him a compatible heart. After locking himself, his son and a handful of doctorsinto an operating room, the operation gets underway however, a compatible heart inactive is yet to be found. Much of the time in this film is dog-tired on the search for a compatible heart, and also Johns communication with the media and police outside the infirmary corresponding it is some manner of negotiation, when in reality what he wants is just a good life for his son.Nearing the end of the movie, a heart still cannot be found. So John is on the verge of killing himself so that his son can live. So he puts a single bullet into his gun and puts the gun slow toward his head. At this point in the movie, it is revealed that the whole time John was retention up the hospital with an unloaded pistol. However, just in the nick of time, a donor is found and Johns wife runs hysterically toward the hospital to assure that both her husband and son make it out of that expression alive. Eventually the heart reaches the hospital and the young boy survives. John is sentenced to something like 2 to 3 years in prison for holding the emergency room hostage.The movie John Q presents to the viewer in a very clear fashion what is known as an honorable vignette, which was introduced in the 80s by Kohlberg. As our class talked about rather extensively and the textbook touches on Kohlberg, was a famous psychologist in the early 80s. His studies were primarily concentrate on moral reasoning, or the thinking that occurs as we consider right field and prostitute. Kohlbe rg also presents the idea of vignettes, or a perplexing moral situation where something morally wrong must be done in raise to do what a particular individual sees as right or mandatory.Apparently in his research Kohlberg conducted an experiment where he asked mickle of confused age groups to determine the morality of a situation, as well as what they would do if they were in this persons place. And from the responses that these people gave, Kohlberg could tell how well developed these people were intellectually. Kohlberg describes 3 stages of moral development in the text. They are preconventional morality, conventional morality, and postconventional morality. each(prenominal) of these stages are usually achieved by certain ages however, some people whitethorn never fully develop into postconventional morality.In conclusion, I believe in John Q, what John did was totally in his and his families best interest, and is a stark(a) example of an ethical vignette. Ialso believe that John persuasion on a very postconventional scale. He knew what he was doing was morally wrong and against his ideals, however, since the insurance companies are such bloodsuckers, he was left with no choice. However, he was looking out for the best interests of his family and himself and simply refused to let his son die. I think very few people are throw into a situation as drastic as this as quickly as John Q was in the movie, however, it just goes to show that there is no harm for a human life and that hospitals simply shouldnt deny take to those that arent rich. I feel that what John did in this movie was dead acceptable, and it played out very well in Hollywood however, in reality I think he would have been unable to single-handedly take a hold a whole emergency room hostage. But, it still remains a very clear example of an ethical vignette. And is a perfect portal of the saying desperate times call for desperate measures.